Skip to content

A/B Test Table ​

The main results table for analysis of two variants (control vs. treatment).

Table Structure ​

The table contains one row for each metric from the uploaded file. Columns show key statistics comparing the two groups.

Metric ​

The metric name from the uploaded CSV file. Metrics with a P marker are primary metrics that form a family for FDR correction (if correction is enabled in analysis settings).

Green row color means a statistically significant result — p-value is less than the specified significance level (alpha), which is configured in analysis parameters.

Processing ​

The type of preprocessing applied to the metric:

  • — (empty) — for conversion metrics (binary), preprocessing is not applied
  • log — logarithmic transformation
  • IQR3 — outlier removal using 3×IQR method
  • winsor5% — winsorization at 5% level
  • winsor1% — winsorization at 1% level

Preprocessing is automatically selected by the system for numeric metrics to minimize the impact of outliers.

Effect (Δ) ​

The difference between treatment and control groups. Format: absolute change (relative change in %).

For conversion metrics:

  • Absolute change in percentage points (pp)
  • Example: 1.50 ( +15.00% ) → conversion increased by 1.5 pp, which is +15% relative to control

For numeric metrics:

  • Absolute change is shown per user
  • Example: -12.70 ( -1.25% ) → GMV per user decreased by 12.70 units, which is -1.25% relative to control

CI Low / CI Up ​

Confidence interval of the effect (95% confidence interval). Shows the range within which the true value of the effect falls with 95% probability.

Interpretation:

  • If interval does not include 0 → effect is statistically significant
  • If interval includes 0 → no confidence in the presence of an effect
  • Narrow interval → high estimation accuracy
  • Wide interval → low accuracy, larger sample needed

Example:

  • CI Low: 0.80, CI Up: 2.20 → effect is in the range from +0.80 to +2.20 (significant)
  • CI Low: -0.50, CI Up: 1.50 → effect can be from -0.50 to +1.50 (not significant)

P-value ​

The probability of obtaining the observed or more extreme difference if, in reality, the change has no effect.

Result is statistically significant if p-value is less than the specified significance level (alpha). By default, α = 0.05 is used, but this value can be configured in analysis parameters.

For primary metrics (with P marker): if FDR correction is enabled, a corrected value (q-value) is displayed here, which accounts for multiple testing across the metric family.

Important: P-value shows whether there is an effect, but does not show its size. Always look at the magnitude of the effect and confidence interval.

ProbW ​

Available only when "Small Samples" method is selected.

The probability that the treatment variant is better than control (Probability of Winning).

Interpretation:

  • > 95% — very high confidence in improvement
  • 90-95% — high confidence
  • 75-90% — moderate confidence
  • 50-75% — low confidence
  • < 50% — the change most likely worsens the metric

Example:

  • ProbW = 89.17% → in 89% of simulations, the treatment variant shows a better result
  • ProbW = 9.23% → in 91% of simulations, control is better than treatment (the change likely worsens the metric)

Decision Making ​

Do not rely only on p-value. Consider:

  1. Effect size: Is it large enough for the business?
  2. Confidence interval: How accurate is the estimate?
  3. Practical significance: Is it worth implementing the change considering the costs?
  4. Side effects: How did other metrics change?

Example of correct decision:

  • Metric purchase_conversion: effect +2.30 ( +23.00% ), CI [+1.50, +3.10], p-value 0.0012
  • Conclusion: Statistically significant increase in conversion by 23%, confidence interval is narrow and does not include 0. The change is clearly positive, worth implementing.

Example of cautious decision:

  • Metric revenue_per_user: effect +0.05 ( +0.50% ), CI [+0.01, +0.09], p-value 0.0180
  • Conclusion: Statistically significant, but the effect is microscopic (+0.5%). Need to assess whether the costs of implementation justify such a small increase.

AB-Labz - Product Experiments Laboratory